Differential expression of the inflammatory ciita gene may be accompanied by altered bone properties in intact sex steroid-deficient female rats

Objective The class II transactivator (CIITA), encoded by the CIITA gene, controls expression of immune response regulators, which affect bone homeostasis. Previously, we investigated a functional CIITA polymorphism in elderly women. Women carrying the allele associated with lower CIITA levels displayed higher bone mineral density (BMD), but also higher bone loss. The present exploratory study in a rat model sought to investigate effects of differential expression of Ciita on bone structural integrity and strength. Two strains DA (normal-to-high expression) and DA.VRA4 (lower expression) underwent ovariectomy (OVX) or sham-surgery at ~ 14-weeks of age (DA OVX n = 8, sham n = 4; DA.VRA4 OVX n = 10, sham n = 2). After 16-weeks, femoral BMD and bone mineral content (BMC) were measured and morphometry and biomechanical testing performed. Results In DA.VRA4 rats, BMD/BMC, cross-sectional area and biomechanical properties were lower. Ciita expression was accompanied by OVX-induced changes to cross-sectional area and femoral shaft strength; DA rats had lower maximum load-to-fracture. Thus, while lower Ciita expression associated with lower bone mass, OVX induced changes to structural and mechanical bone properties were less pronounced. Conclusion The data tentatively suggests association between Ciita expression and structural and mechanical bone properties, and a possible role in bone changes resulting from estrogen deficiency. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13104-023-06543-4.


Introduction
Immune response activation produces pro-inflammatory cytokines which affect bone remodeling [1].TNF-α and IFN-γ play a role in loss of bone induced by estrogendeficiency, leading to osteoporosis [2][3][4].An important component of the inflammation-promoting cascade are the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II antigens [5].MHC gene expression is regulated by the class II transactivator [5]; thus, altered expression of the CIITA gene affects expression of MHC class II antigens and antigen presentation.
In ovariectomised (OVX) mice, Ciita is implicated in the cascade leading to bone loss via increased IFN-γ levels, which stimulate Ciita expression [2].But intact, sexually mature female mice systemically overexpressing Ciita also develop an osteopenic phenotype from 12 to 24 weeks of age [6].
In humans, functional polymorphisms alter CIITA gene expression, hence affecting CIITA levels.Previously, we investigated CIITA rs3087456 polymorphism in elderly women.Women carrying the allele associated with lower CIITA levels displayed higher bone mass, but higher bone loss [7].Moreover, in the same cohort, women with persistently elevated levels of C-reactive protein, also displayed higher bone loss [8].
To investigate the connection between bone properties and different inflammatory backgrounds associated with differences in expression of the Ciita gene, we performed a preliminary study using a well-characterised rat model consisting of two strains with differing expression levels of Ciita [9][10][11].In this exploratory study of female rats using OVX to model estrogen-deficiency, our endpoint was to describe differences in bone structural integrity and strength phenotypes.

Animals and measurements
Animal care and experiments were performed in accordance with the guidelines of relevant institutional authorities and approved by the Animal Ethics Committee, Lund, Sweden.
Young adult females from two inbred rat strains were used: Dark Agouti (DA) and DA.VRA4, which are genetically identical except for different alleles in the VRA4 locus on chromosome 10 including the Ciita gene.This results in lower Ciita expression in the DA.VRA4 strain (DA has normal-to-high expression).Development of the congenic strain has been described in detail [10,12] and the differential expression characterised in a variety of tissues [9][10][11].
Sacrifice was 16 wks post-surgery (~ 30w old).Animals were euthanized (at end of the study, or for welfare reasons) by an intraperitoneal overdose of Pentobarbital (200 mg/kg).
Animals were weighed on Day 0, 3 weeks and at sacrifice.Urine was collected (at 3 and 16 weeks).At sacrifice 16 weeks post-surgery, left and right femurs were excised and blood sampled via cardiac puncture.
Femurs (R) were scanned (with a slight repositioning of bones between scans) and total femoral bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) were measured blinded (PIXI DXA Densitometer and PIXI-Mus software v2.0, Lunar Corporation, USA).Results are the mean from two scans.
Biomechanical properties were evaluated in the (R) femur (Electron E1000 scanner, Instron, UK).Shear test: Femur was fixed vertically and an anvil lowered onto the femoral head until femoral neck fracture.

Statistical analysis
Comparison of weight and percentage weight-gain used 2-way-ANOVA (Sidak's post-hoc).As there was an effect of strain on body-weight from 3 weeks onwards 2-way ANCOVA with body-weight as a covariate and BMD and BMC as independent variables was performed (SAS JMP 16.0).
In the analyses we report the overall effects on bone parameters of rat strain (regardless of OVX status) and from OVX (regardless of strain).Interaction between strain and OVX was also assessed.To assess these overall effects absolute values were compared using 2-way ANOVA (Sidak's post-hoc), or for non-normally distributed data, Kruskal-Wallis test (Dunn's post-hoc) was used.
Changes in bone parameters (delta values) in OVX versus respective sham groups were calculated for each strain (using individual OVX values subtracted from sham means) and reported as percentage change to account for potential differences in baseline levels.When there was an overall effect of OVX (regardless of strain) and/or a significant difference between at least one of the OVX groups compared to respective sham, comparison used unpaired two-way t-test.
Unless otherwise stated, analyses were performed in GraphPad Prism 9. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results
After Day 0 VRA4 rats weighed less than DA although weight-gain was similar in both strains, over time and in response to OVX (supplementary-Table-1, Additional file-1).
Key results relating to differential Ciita expression and bone structural integrity and strength parameters are summarised in Figure -1.
Overall, bone density and bone volume were unaffected by strain and OVX (supplementary-Fig- 2,Additional−file 3).Regardless of OVX, cortical CSA and Imax levels were lower in the DA.VRA4 strain (p < 0.001 and p < 0.05), whereas periosteal perimeter, thickness, and Imin did not differ between strains (Figure -1B; supplementary-Fig- 3 A,Additional−file 4).OVX decreased cortical CSA (across strains), but nominally less in the VRA4 strain (p = 0.058).Furthermore, while OVX increased cortical thickness, this was less pronounced in the DA.VRA4 strain, and no other parameters were affected (supplementary-Fig- 3 A,Additional−file 4).Trabecular thickness differed between the four groups (p < 0.05), supplementary-Fig- 3B, Additional−file 4).Strain per se did not affect thickness, and while OVX induced a slight increase, there were no differences within each strain.No other trabecular parameters were affected (supplementary-Fig- 3, Additional−file 4).
In the DA.VRA4 strain, femoral shaft strength and toughness parameters (maximum load, load-at-break, energy-at-break) were lower than in the DA strain (Figure-1 C; supplementary-Fig- 4 A, Additional−file 5), whereas flexure-extension-at-break and E-modulus (elasticity parameters) were unaffected by strain.Although OVX decreased maximum load regardless of strain, it did not differ between strains; only reaching significance in the DA strain at post-hoc analysis.Following OVX, there was an apparent increase in flexure-extension-at-break (p < 0.05) and energy-at-break (p < 0.01), but did not differ between strains.OVX did not affect load at break or E-modulus: There were no overall effects of strain (regardless of OVX) or OVX (regardless of strain) on shear test parameters (supplementary-Fig- 4B, Additional−file 5).
An interaction between strain and OVX on serum OC was observed (Table 1.iv-v) with higher levels Table 1 Bone biomarker levels in rat strains differentially expressing the Ciita gene   Comparison with corresponding DA (sham/OVX) # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001, ns, not significant in the DA strain following OVX, while decreasing in DA.VRA4.

Discussion
This study investigated bone properties in rat strains with allelic differences in expression of the Ciita gene, encoding the pro-inflammatory protein Ciita.While the results should be interpreted with caution, differential Ciita expression may be associated with changes to structural integrity and strength with the low Ciita expressing strain (DA.VRA4) displaying lower BMD, BMC and cross-sectional area.Other mechanical properties reflecting bone strength/stiffness were also affected, such that lower energy was required to fracture.Strain differences may also explain differences observed following OVX.
In mice Ciita overexpression leads to an osteopenic phenotype [6], and indirect induction of Ciita expression induces bone loss [2].In post-menopausal women, lower CIITA expression associated with increased bone mass [7].However, in this experimental model lower Ciita levels appeared to be overall detrimental to bone.
Without having performed histomorphometry we can only speculate whether this observation is due to sample size or reflects the complex negative and positive feedback loops regulating bone homeostasis.In line with our findings, in vitro Ciita over expression in murine osteoclasts (responsible for bone resorption) decreased osteoclastogenesis, whereas down-regulation (siRNA) enhanced it [16].
The observations from the present study collectively, albeit tentatively, suggest that Ciita levels may have a role in the skeletal degradation induced by estrogen-deficiency.Estrogen is proposedly important in regulating Ciita [17,18].In vitro studies demonstrate estradiol down-regulates Ciita expression in breast carcinoma cell lines (reversed by anti-estrogens) [18] and indirectly down-regulates Ciita expression in macrophages [17].We can speculate that in our model, OVX increased Ciita levels in both strains, since the suppressing effect of estrogen was eliminated which is in keeping with mice studies, where OVX increased Ciita expression, leading to bone loss [2].Ovariectomy was accompanied by decreased BMD and BMC, but the extent did not appear to be affected by differences in Ciita expression.Interpreting the effects on bone strength is hampered by the sham group sizes.The lower Ciita expression in DA.VRA4 rats may have delayed or reduced negative effects of OVX on bone mass, but it is possible the regulatory mechanisms differ in early and late post-menopause.Also, our knowledge of gene-environment and gene-gene interactions involved in regulating Ciita are limited.
Although using a rat strain with congenitally low Ciita expression should more closely represent the natural differences in genetic background in humans, compared to knock-out models, the study has limitations making it difficult to do more than tentatively suggest that differential Ciita expression is accompanied by altered bone properties.

Limitations
The model does not fully translate to post-menopausal osteoporosis and the variation in age at OVX (12-17 weeks) makes it difficult to distinguish between effects on bone acquisition and bone loss, even if an inflammatory environment affects bone metabolism.On the other hand, in intact mice overexpressing Ciita, bone loss has been observed at 24 weeks, but not at 6 or 12 [8].Also, the success of OVX was not verified, by uterine weight or estrogen assays.
The low size of the sham groups (premature termination due to poor clinical condition) is a major limitation, not fully offset by the 2 × 2 study design (maximising power within this setting) and the very low standard deviation of many parameters which enabled post hoc identification of apparent differences.Replacing the lost animals would have ensured more robust results.
Gene or protein expression levels of Ciita were not measured, although differential expression of Ciita has been well-characterised in these strains, and we assume bone to be in line with other tissues.Genetic drift or other genetic differences in the two rat models may be possible.
Only femoral properties were assessed; compression tests on lumbar vertebrae could add information on trabecular bone strength, possibly clarifying why changes were predominantly observed in cortical but not trabecular bone.Additional structural variables, might have helped interpretation, as could in situ cell number and activity.
These acknowledged limitations may explain several paradoxical results.In DA rats cortical thickness increased, but CSA decreased, despite an unchanged periosteal perimeter and appears to conflict with the decreased bone strength observed.Additionally, although osteocalcin usually decreases following OVX, urinary levels increased.

Conclusion
The study tentatively suggests association between Ciita expression and bone structural and mechanical properties, and possibly response to estrogen deficiency, overall supporting a role for inflammation influencing skeletal integrity.This highly interesting pathophysiological pathway warrants exploring in relation to osteoporosis and even bone accrual.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Summary of femoral bone properties associated with differential expression of Ciita and response to OVX.Panel A. Absolute BMD and BMC values (left) and % change (right).Panel B. Cortical shaft cross-sectional area and thickness (left), absolute values and % change (middle) and representative images of transverse section of the femoral shaft (right) Panel C. Maximum load and flexure extension at break of femoral shaft (left) and % change (right).Comparison with corresponding DA (sham/OVX) # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001, ns, not significant Biomarker values are mean ± SD.Urinary (mg/mmol), serum (ng/ml).Urine CTX-1 and osteocalcin are creatinine corrected.NA, not applicable.Ns, not significant a Insufficient sample volume for quantification in one animal.Single-measurement for b one or c three samples (insufficient volume for double-measurements).